Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EarthCheck
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Sustainable Tourism CRC. Redirecting on the suggestion from the only !voter. Consider this a no consensus close. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:58, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- EarthCheck (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Tagged the month before last with multiple issues - none addressed. Creator indefinitely blocked for likely COI etc; text still POV, completely unreferenced. Google news search gets some hits, but almost entirely to internal industry online news stuff. This does not appear genuinely notable in its own right, and even if it might be, there are no signs of anyone showing interest in establishing that notability. At the very most the program might be noted at the page for EC3 Global - but that page too has multiple problems, including possible COI issues with its contributors. This and related pages look like an exercise in pushing a particular group of industry initiatives backed by a company. hamiltonstone (talk) 02:50, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:01, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:02, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Sustainable Tourism CRC. I have redirected the related EC3 Global page to Sustainable Tourism CRC. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 21:13, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.