Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Earl Gilkey
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. John254 02:58, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Earl Gilkey[edit]
- Earl Gilkey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Declined speedy as asserts notability with hall of fame award. Only a smattering of Google hits, but it can be hard to establish notability with martial artists. Bringing it here to be sure. Dlohcierekim 14:36, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutral/Keep - He did receive a national championship, in his weight class, in 2001 from IKF as shown here [1]. That maybe enough for inclusion. Does the article need a rewrite - definite YES. Thanks ShoesssS Talk 15:27, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:21, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:21, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:22, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:22, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Week keep Based on Shoessss source, but needs cleaning up. Also note Internet Halls of fame are often based on paying to be added, and it seems like an awfully long list with no details as to why people are on it.--Nate1481 15:02, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- See also WP:MANOTE
- Keep champion via notable, professional org. (International Kickboxing Federation). JJL (talk) 15:21, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.