Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Earhart Environmental Magnet Elementary School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 01:25, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Earhart Environmental Magnet Elementary School[edit]

reason non Notable school artcle does not say why school is impotent enough to be on here also high school like it or not in my mind are notable so they should be on here but i am sorry i always say keep the high school articles but no offenice we need to draw the line somewhere Oo7565 17:46, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomOo7565 17:52, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions. -- Noroton 01:47, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as copyvio from here, and tagged as such. TerriersFan 02:05, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
~~Weak delete~~ This article needs wikifying, expanding, cleaning up and improving - not deleting - at the moment its just a lot of copied text but a good editor could really make this article shine. Fornow I opposed the speedy delete and will change to keep if the article is improved. LordHarris 02:44, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - the speedy delete is without prejudice to a new article being recreated. It does, however, remove the copyright material from the history, to avoid problems with the copyright holders, and allows a clean start. TerriersFan 02:49, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I have just done a large edit to the article and removed most of the copied text. I've tried to rewrite a lot of parts but the article still needs work. I have added a schools info box as well as three seperate references (one of which is the actual schools site). I have placed the hang on to contest the speedy deletion as this article is no longer a clear copyright violation. In the case of afd, I change to keep based on the recent edits. LordHarris 03:25, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per WP:N. --Butseriouslyfolks 06:19, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I have removed the speedy now cleanup has started, However, the whole of the 'School History' section was also copyvio so I have removed that. TerriersFan 17:32, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Lord Harris' changes — kudos! Noroton 00:56, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Article has been expanded, and details regarding recognition by the Blue Ribbon Schools Program, the highedt award that an American school can receive, constitute a strong claim of notability. Alansohn 03:13, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Blue Ribbon schools, in the top 4% of US schools, are inherently notable. TerriersFan 04:01, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as rewritten since it now describes the subject in a notable sense and fulfills our attribution requirements. Burntsauce 17:26, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep LordHarris's work makes this worth keeping now. ALKIVAR™ ☢ 19:24, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Blue Ribbon award. Xarr 17:14, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - per nom. Artaxiad 21:05, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.