Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ESP LTD EC-1000

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 20:43, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ESP LTD EC-1000

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found no significant coverage of this guitar. SL93 (talk) 21:09, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:38, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -Scottywong | talk _ 18:11, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dalit No GNG. Dalit Llama (talk) 22:08, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unreferenced, non notable, no coverage in reliable sources, fails WP:GNG →B music ian 00:28, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no refs are there nor can be found. Also notability is a question so it is not notable. →TSU ^tp* 17:07, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per User:Bmusician (a musicians advice must be paid heed to)--Ðℬig XЯaɣ 10:29, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.