Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EOceans
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 08:13, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
EOceans[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- EOceans (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NCORP. Refbombed, but basically there's a single good ref: [1]. [2] is reputable but isn't WP:SIGCOV, and the rest is non-notable awards, or non-independent papers by the founder. ~ A412 talk! 17:22, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Environment, Software, and Websites. Skynxnex (talk) 17:58, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:45, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:02, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete – per nom. Saltwire seems like a press release as well. TLA (talk) 06:35, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.