Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EMU Australia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 02:07, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

EMU Australia[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This dosen't appear to be a notable company. I was unable to find any reliable sources for it, and the article itself isn't sourced. Sven Manguard Wha? 17:43, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Clearly could use some expansion, but this company is notable since it came on the sheepskin products market after the major Ugg Australia brand was established. Emu is considered the alternative brand, which many people invest in and has evolved into a fashion trend in the early 2000s. Tinton5 (talk) 18:06, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

where are the sources to back your claims? LibStar (talk) 15:41, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 23:40, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Found this article from The Australian in the first page of my gnews search and there appears to be plenty more like it. Meets WP:GNG. Jenks24 (talk) 00:25, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

delete fails WP:GNG. the Australian article is the only 1 decent source I could find. Rest of coverage is mainly small mentions. LibStar (talk) 15:33, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Amused to see the sheepskin boots showing up again — it's clearly a pitched battle for this market. Anyway, here's another source: Emu uggs in legal scramble]. Warden (talk) 17:29, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep International company, yet another reliable source is here. Unscintillating (talk) 23:34, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.