Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ECustoms

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:27, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ECustoms

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Limited notability company. Cloudbound (talk) 23:13, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 01:34, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 01:34, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 01:34, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Clearly not yet notable local company with certainly a lengthy article history but never any solid better improvement. SwisterTwister talk 06:17, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:11, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:42, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The subject doesn't pass WP:GNG from the sources provided and any other I couldn't find. Kansiime (talk) 05:53, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I simply cannot find any significant coverage for this company. Most search results (Google/DuckDuckGo/HighBeam) are about immigration customs of different countries. sst ✈ 05:33, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.