Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ECatalog

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete moink 00:31, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ECatalog

This article has no useful content, and doesn't seem to have any potential to grow to the point where it's useful. The title seems to be a neologism that isn't widely used, and few people are likely to look for it under this title. Nothing links to the article. Bcrowell 03:00, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete even if it's notable (and I don't think it is), it should be on Wikitionary. --djrobgordon 03:04, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, this stub could easily be expanded. Royboy crashfan 03:04, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- Neologism and borderline dicdef, and I doubt if it can be expanded beyond that. Reyk 03:07, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Dicdef. If this is a truly valid term why no mention at e-commerce or online shopping? -- Krash (Talk) 03:18, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not sure it could be expanded beyond just the dicdef -- Samir ∙ T C 08:47, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as neologism Compu terjoe 20:32, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Neologism. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 21:08, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above. ProhibitOnions 22:39, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.