Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EC English Language Schools

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:44, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

EC English Language Schools[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reads like a WP:PROMO article of this company. There are a list of articles as references but they seem like routine local coverage. I don't see anything notable about the company. Don't think this meet WP:GNG and WP:CORP. FuriouslySerene (talk) 18:06, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:12, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:12, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:12, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as certainly not inherited for schools notability as it's not a formal school and there's also nothing else as the article is tossed about, not making it easy to comfortably navigate. Delete at best and restart when there's better information and sources as the current is simply not satisfying. SwisterTwister talk 07:27, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:09, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - there is literally not a single source other than multiple links to its website. Bearian (talk) 18:26, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 05:00, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - it does not meet the guidelines for schools' notability. Tom29739 ^[talk] 20:43, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article is a good example of what Wikipedia is not. Questionable notability, references sourced mostly to a single source and use of Wikipedia as some kind of a business listing. WP:TNT this. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 01:57, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.