Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E. David Cook
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) —Theopolisme (talk) 06:36, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- E. David Cook (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Tagged for notability for 5 years; couldn't establish notability Boleyn (talk) 18:58, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 17:02, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 17:02, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 17:02, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 17:02, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 17:02, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 17:02, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per WP:PROF, criterion 5 - named chair appointment at a major institution. StAnselm (talk) 20:41, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep having a chair at an institution as notable as Wheaton clearly makes him notable -- not sure why tagged as UK=related. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:02, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment – response to Peterkingiron, it was listed under UK as according to this that's where he is originally from. If you have any questions on deletion sortings in future best to ask me on my talk page as I can't possibly have all the deletion discussions on my watchlist & only just noticed your message. Best wishes ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:44, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Passes WP:Prof#C5. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:38, 21 January 2013 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.