Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E-Wrestling Finishers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Anas ^talk? 01:21, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

E-Wrestling Finishers[edit]

A list of finishing moves used by imaginary wrestlers in Internet wrestling federations (imaginary federations run by wrestling fans). Not notable. Hobson 14:55, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete with the "Over-the-top-rope AfD bomb" as a finisher. Wildthing61476 15:07, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Haha...good call on the AfD bomb Plm209^{(talk • contribs)} 17:24, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a good example of WP:NOT#INDISCRIMINATE. And I'm not even taking into account the notability of the "e-wrestlers" themselves. Spellcast 15:10, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - completely non-notable, consists of only external links with little context. I would not disagree with a CSD A1 or G11. east.718 15:43, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletions. -- -- pb30<talk> 16:11, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable list Corpx 16:53, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- per all of the above. E ddie 18:44, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, also per all of the above. Nikki311 20:05, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because none of mine are on the list. And because it's absolutely indiscriminate information that has no encyclopedic value. Tony Fox (arf!) review? 20:22, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
'Speedy Delete per east718. Nevermind the fact that e-wrestlers and e-feds are inherently not-notable (I can't even recall one that ever survived an AFD here). TJ Spyke 21:06, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete No e-fed much less individual character should be within shouting distance of Wikipedia, nuke it MPJ-DK 00:02, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all of the above. E-feds are just not notable here. -- Oakster Talk 10:25, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
As an e-fed wrestler ... Delete. I do sort of reel at the hostility, but I can agree with where it comes from--it's a very niche thing. Looking over this, the closest I came to anything enlightening was seeing a fellow wrestler there ... except it wasn't even him. IL-Kuma 02:12, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.