Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dynasty (video game) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to List of Apple II games. Sandstein 08:48, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dynasty (video game)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable video game, no sourcing found, untouched since 2006 Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:40, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not entirely sure why North speedy kept the article on the previous nom less than a week ago... My inclination is to redirect to Hamurabi given the stated connection in the article, but the lack of any sources on Google gives me pause. --Izno (talk) 18:54, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It does appear to have existed based on those two links. I'm for a redirect to List of Apple II games. --Izno (talk) 19:45, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Izno (talk) 18:54, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As WP:OR unless someone can bring forward a source that proves its notability (even for inclusion in Hamurabi)._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 12:40, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:29, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete [1] was the best reference I could find. We explicitly avoid having articles on hundreds of thousands of iPhone apps that are more notable (and have more verifiable information) than this. power~enwiki (π, ν) 20:22, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You guys really don't like to look very hard. There are under 20 games mentioned in the 70s here but you guys hurry to remove stuff from pre-Internet era. Good job cabals! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.24.151.20 (talk) 17:59, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
There's no cabal here. It's an ancient game which makes it difficult to identify in a WP:BEFORE-worthy search that the game even exists and isn't a hoax. As it happens, Google basically IDs one solid hit, which is the one you found. The article looks like a thesis, so it's not the best WP:RS material, but I think it's enough for a redirect. --Izno (talk) 19:45, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Izno. ╠╣uw [talk] 11:30, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.