Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dwayne Wayne
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. kurykh 07:29, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Dwayne Wayne[edit]
- Dwayne Wayne (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This character does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 19:09, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- KeepLead character in a 6-year long, very notable television series, and (with some small effort), likely very verifiable in 3rd party sources. If nothing else, I remember as a kid the show being featured several times in TV Guide... and I never even watched the show, lol. Hopefully just get some sources up, and the issue will be dealt with. JasonDUIUC (talk) 22:50, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:22, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- Shell babelfish 00:38, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect - There are no references and little information beyond a plot summary. Its unlikely that this level of detail is necessary for an encyclopedic treatment of the subject. Redirect to the show and include an pertinent information there (if sources can be found). Shell babelfish 00:40, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as unreferenced original research. Stifle (talk) 09:18, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep long-running series, I believe appeared on two series. Article needs improved and cleaned up...--Paul McDonald (talk) 13:37, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep needs some cleanup, but that's not a criterion for deletion. Subject matter is fundamentally appropriate for encyclopaedic treatment. WilyD 15:00, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and improve. Sources exist.[1] - — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peregrine Fisher (talk • contribs)
- Keep Central character of long-running and very notable TV series,and also culprit behind brief fad for Flip-up glasses. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:44, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.