Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dutch Square

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep --JForget 00:02, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dutch Square[edit]

The article doesn't make it clear how this mall is notable, and I haven't been able to find any indication of notability outside of Wikipedia. A ecis^Brievenbus 22:12, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no sources can be found on this mall. Also note, it was previously deleted before (but with different content). Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 22:31, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. At first glance, most of the Google News searches I was finding seemed trivial. But the fact that the town annexed the mall certainly isn't trivial! Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 22:58, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Where did you look for sources? I see a lot of stuff here. Zagalejo^^^ 22:39, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have access to Newsbank, so I can add some material later. I have to get going right now, though. Zagalejo^^^ 23:00, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Actually annexation seems very trivial to me. It's probably done tens of thousands of times a year in the U.S. alone, and is almost always of strictly local interest only. Quale (talk) 19:22, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Zagelejo (nice catch!), some of those sources write specifically about the mall. --- tqbf 22:43, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malls-related deletion discussions. -- Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 23:05, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per TPH are ors. Mall iks notable, article just needs some work to clean it up some more. Thewinchester ^(talk) 12:53, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above, WP:HEY. Bearian (talk) 19:43, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This mall is unique in that it was virtually a "dead mall" and destined for closure but has since been given a new lease on life. A good example of urban renewal. Toddbarwick (talk) 03:57, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:N. --Shark face 217 20:47, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.