Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dunjonquest (series)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:12, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Dunjonquest (series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to fail WP:GNG. A search on Google yields lots of fansites and such, but no reliable sources, and then a search on Highbeam Research yields zero results. SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:59, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (Search video game sources) • Gene93k (talk) 23:52, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:52, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Try Google Books. Dungeons and desktops (A K Peters, Ltd., 2008), PC Magazine (PC Communications Corp., 1982), Popular Mechanics (Hearst Magazines, Oct 1980) et cetera, et cetera. Marasmusine (talk) 12:13, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - it predates the web so online searches will be hard to come by, but there are multiple independent contemporary references such as this one, for example. andy (talk) 08:54, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - WP:NTEMP Clearly these games were notable at the time of publication. Whether or not (as the only game in the series to have its own article) Temple of Apshai should be merged into this article is another matter. Rubiscous (talk) 17:33, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.