Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dumitru Popescu (entrepreneur)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:12, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dumitru Popescu (entrepreneur)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There’s a chance the guy is notable, but it seems at least as likely he isn’t, which is why I brought this here. — Biruitorul ^Talk 16:09, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Romania. Shellwood (talk) 16:12, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment looks like ref stacking. From what I understand, he's head of the Romanian version of NASA? Could be notable, but there's too much to digest here, with every second word in the first section having a source. Not sure how notable the Aeronautics society thing is. Oaktree b (talk) 17:46, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The head of the Romanian Space Agency is someone else. — Biruitorul ^Talk 18:00, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:42, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:04, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Promotional article, likely undisclosed COI issues. MrsSnoozyTurtle 00:10, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:REFBOMBed to the max, but the referencing is actually rather weak and lacking enough WP:SIGCOV by reliable sources to establish a WP:GNG pass. Even if GNG were met there's a pretty strong case for deletion under WP:TNT. Best, GPL93 (talk) 22:39, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.