Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duma Optronics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:26, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Duma Optronics[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD

Lack of independent sources as to its notability. They make some interesting things. This makes a page that looks more like a portal to optical techniques. There's nothing here that speaks to the company, or why this company doing its everyday business is WP:NOTABLE. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:03, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 14:38, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - A few searches only found a few passing mentions, hardly notable and acceptable yet. SwisterTwister talk 00:06, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 00:06, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 00:06, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 00:06, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. Sir Joseph ^(talk) 00:42, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.