Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dum-Doodles
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 00:27, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Dum-Doodles (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Apart from a bit of local press, cannot find independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources, either those in the article or elsewhere online - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST. Promotional article, created by a WP:SPA. Edwardx (talk) 18:04, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 18:20, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Visual arts, Comics and animation, and Webcomics. Netherzone (talk) 18:53, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:40, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.