Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duhow Rubber

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 02:31, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Duhow Rubber

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced article, fails WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH Flat Out (talk) 04:38, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete our edits must have crossed. I PRODed for the same reason a minute before the nomination. Non-notable company that fails GNG. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:39, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 16:18, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 16:18, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Googling the company's Chinese name"东昊橡胶" results only 50 pages. None of them qualifies as a reliable source.--Skyfiler (talk) 17:10, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Blatant WP:PROMO.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:58, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.