Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dug North

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 19:48, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dug North

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is about an artist with no significant coverage in independent reliable sources to establish notability, nor does there appear to be anything to meet WP:ARTIST. The artist's web site lists being in an extra feature for the Blu-ray release for the movie Hugo, but that falls well short of what is needed to establish notability. Whpq (talk) 13:53, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:29, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:30, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as failing WP:ARTIST. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:15, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete—I tried to clean up the article some (if only for other AfD'ers to make some sense of it) but I fear it's for nothing... he seems totally non-notable. The claims in the article are either not evidence of notability, or unverifiable. Livit⇑^Eh?/_What? 17:15, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.