Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dubya Dubya Three
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 23:56, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable neologism -- violates WP:NEO Morton devonshire 00:13, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - non notable and little point in keeping -- Tawker 00:20, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Karl Rove 00:42, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. OK, that article just puzzled me to no end, it's so weird... --Bill (who is cool!) 00:54, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per everyone above. I was also quite puzzled. But no matter what, it was jsut an nn neologism. -- Kicking222 01:14, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, neologism. --Terence Ong 03:06, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above -- a weird part of me almost thinks it might be better to simply slap in a redirect to World War III, as redirects are cheap and harmless, but honestly, I can't really see anyone who wants to read about WW3 typing in "dubya dubya three" instead... Anyone dumb enough to do so probably couldn't read the article anyway. -- Captain Disdain 04:47, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. jni 07:35, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, clearly. (If you think the article's disconnected, try the talk page). Vizjim 10:23, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete neologism (and yeah, it's a bit odd) Trebor 11:21, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, non-notable and non-verifiable neologism. JIP | Talk 11:31, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Useless WP:NOT article: neologism, little more than dicdef, no sources. Шизомби 12:13, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Xyrael T 17:02, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn Crazynas 18:36, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOT a soapbox and nn neologism.--Jersey Devil 20:33, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Odd neologism, no sources. Grandmasterka 01:05, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to WW3 --999 02:16, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete → Wombdpsw - @ ← 02:20, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete agreed, non-notable neologism. --Northmeister 03:52, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Carr
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.