The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedily deleted by another admin. Mindmatrix 20:01, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fails to assert notability of the book. Seems to be advertising. Demiurge 13:06, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as per nom. Demiurge 13:06, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as per nom = Spam. Guliolopez 14:11, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
