Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DruandMaine

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snowball Delete among established editors or rather editors minus the possible meatpuppets. --JForget 01:06, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DruandMaine[edit]

DruandMaine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Delete nn music producers whose only claim to fame is that they produced a single for a nn artist. No RS for any of this. Mayalld (talk) 09:02, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy delete This article has been speedyed 4-5 times already and the user who creates it has been warned 2 times not to create it again or be blocked. --Twinzor (talk) 13:11, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. This article has been repeatedly recreated and deleted over the last few days (see Dru N Maine, Dru & Maine), and still does not assert sufficient notability. The author was warned by an admin not to recreate it [1]. --Bonadea (talk) 09:15, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • DO NOT Delete this is Maine the producer and there is no reason to delete this article it is great and has all the info about them and

my manger will add more info when it comes available —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mainetoronto2000 (talk • contribs) 09:28, 25 June 2008 (UTC) — Mainetoronto2000 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

  • Delete; there's at most one reliable source, and that doesn't mention Dru and Maine. Huon (talk) 10:01, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete. Non-notable. Whether it is true or not is immaterial, reliable sources are needed to prove notability.Yobmod (talk) 10:55, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete as recreation of deleted content, if the first commenter is correct.--Michael WhiteT·C 11:48, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I smell socks. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 14:09, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as non-notable and non-verifiable - Admittedly it is only google, google images, and google news (including the archives) that I searched for "Dru and Maine", "Dru & Maine", and "Dru N Maine" but, not matter what I got buptkiss. not to mention the COI, and puppeteering that seems to exist. Jasynnash2 (talk) 16:10, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete Non-notable and non-verifiable. AlwaysOnion (talk) 16:14, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete, salt and block creator(s) if it shows up again. Persistent re-creation with presence of multiple socks shows good faith can no longer be assumed regarding this article. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:30, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per everyone above. Since someone claims he can get references, we should give him the benefit of the doubt and not speedy the close. I might change to a speedy if someone shows me links to the previous deletion discussions. --Explodicle (talk) 19:47, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • DO NOT Delete I am speaking on behalf of Dru and Maine, this article is necessary as they are aspiring producers with a lot of work that will be sourced ASAP. Please do not delete. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by AJ Rios (talk • contribs) 21:20, 25 June 2008 (UTC) — AJ Rios (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
  • Gosh, how coincidental that all five people who oppose deletion started their comments with the exact same choice of words, "DO NOT Delete"..... ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:27, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • PLEASE DO NOT DELETE I want to add that if you please check the IP address's i'm sure that all of these DO NOT DELETE comments will be from differant ip's. Please check if you are questioning that. Thank you.
  • PLEASE DO NOT DELETEDRU N MAINE ARE UNDER UNIVERSAL RECORDS AT HITSUNLTD... ARE KNOWN IN CANADA.. LEAVE IT ALONE PLESAE AND THANK YOU THERES OTHER PPL ON THIS WIKIPEDIA THAT SHOULDNT BE ON HERE STOP WASTING TIME WITH US.. THIS IS REDCILOUS THIS DRU SPEAKING AND IN A WEEK OUR WEBSITE IS GONNA BE UP TO EDIT SO STOP DOIN THIS ..PLEASE AND THNAK YOU —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drubearz (talk • contribs) 21:54, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • PLEASE DO NOT DELETE because i dont like drutoronto2000.. i want it to be drubeatz whats the problem? ..
  • PLEASE DO NOT DELETE Listen why do you guys want to delete their page so badly? I mean their are some POINTLESS pages out there, DRU and MAINE are actually real producers with credibility in Toronto. Deal with the pointless pages. Stop wasting your time.
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:20, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/DruandMaine&oldid=1137804416"