Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drop Bass Network

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Rave. MBisanz ^talk 00:52, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Drop Bass Network

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While DBN has some notoriety in niche circles, there isn't any significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It's only mentioned in passing in a custom Google search of reliable music sources. A redirect to an article on early American rave culture (esp. in the Midwest or Chicago) could work, if necessary. czar 13:38, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. czar 13:39, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Redirect: A Google News search and scour through a couple of common music sources has turned up nothing which compels me to suggest keeping this article. The article itself does not contain much content - I do agree with a redirect. -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 13:42, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete there is nothing notable about this production company, but a redirect could be beneficial as stated above. --Shootingstar111 (talk) 00:08, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and then Redirect when that's available as there currently seems to be no actual article for that, my searches only found a few links thus article is still questionable. SwisterTwister talk 00:10, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.