Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Droideka

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:45, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Droideka[edit]

Droideka (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'd speedy this as non-notable but odds are that the tag would be removed because there is a Rizla Blue-thin assertion of notability. TheLongTone (talk) 15:17, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:15, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:15, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep References seem legit. That said, I think it's highly questionable to make this artist the default page for the term. I note that the move was made recently and that should probably be reverted. Chunky Rice (talk) 19:09, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 14:13, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me can this debate please continue the person who requested this article for deletion hasn't added any input. In my eyes I would Keep this article.-Robert Hill-Forntongoover

The man is entirely non-notable. The sole claim to notability is a single hit recording, Get Hyper, two years ago. There is an article on that, which seems to be enough.TheLongTone (talk) 18:02, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
According to the music notabiliy a person who has a single on a chart is notable-2.122.250.20 (talk)
  • Keep. Passes wp:music, has charted. Szzuk (talk) 20:26, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, as he passes the notability guideline for musicians, as a charting artist (though without doubt the article could do with some expansion work). That said, I'm all in favour of the phrase "Rizla Blue-thin assertion of notability" becoming a thing, as per TheLongTone. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 10:56, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.