The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Titoxd(?!? - help us) 00:49, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like (non-patent) nonsense and a hoax. 0 google hits. - Bobet 16:28, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as uncommon hoax. Tagged. SYCTHOStalk 16:46, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - joke. Latinus 20:13, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator. Turnstep 18:21, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
