Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drew Pearson (actor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Swarm ♠ 04:08, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Drew Pearson (actor)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lovefest for non notable actor. Bit part actor. Lacks multiple significant roles in notable productions. Outside of some hyperlocal puff he lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Awards are not major (or sourced). duffbeerforme (talk) 08:05, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. At least the portrait in this article looks Featured picture quality, but I can't say the same could be possible for the article due to the topic's lacking notability. edtiorEهեইдအီးËეεઈדוארई電子ಇអ៊ី전자ഇī😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎 11:55, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 14:38, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Does not meet any of the WP:NACTOR criteria, and there are no solid WP:RS sources to be found discussing this actor. /wiae /tlk 15:20, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nothing particularly better for WP:CREATIVE. SwisterTwister talk 17:58, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - definitely doesn't pass WP:NACTOR, and nothing in searches to show he passes WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:49, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.