Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drew Paul

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:35, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Drew Paul

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, WP:V, and WP:PROMO. The only independant coverage of this man is a passing mention of a soundman [1] and a local news story from 2010 for having saved someone from drowning [2]. There is no other independant coverage of him. Pieczenik is his mentor. These awards are either not notable or not verifiable at all. No mention of him in documents from the Carnegie Institute, it doesn't even appear that the event awards prizes. – Thjarkur (talk) 08:17, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. – Thjarkur (talk) 08:17, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — I suspect this is the creating user's own identity (or maybe a close relative). In any case, I see nothing WP:Notable. White Whirlwind 咨 08:51, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:58, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Don't Delete After reviewing the article and sources I have found this subject to be sufficiently notable and Sources are also reliable. Do not delete this articleWP:PERFECT. .". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnwick858 (talk • contribs) 10:00, 13 April 2020 (UTC) [reply]
Don't Delete I have looked the sources provided are 100% notable and this is not the creating user's own identity (and no one closer to him),So should not delete. WP:PERFECT. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Syedmurtaza128 (talk • contribs) 12:30, 13 April 2020 (UTC) [reply]
Blocked socks: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Syedmurtaza128. MER-C 16:03, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - likely paid-for spam. I've blocked the creator for this. The two socks above were paid spammers. MER-C 16:04, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails to meet any of the relevant notability criteria. --Jack Frost (talk) 23:42, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for someone claiming to be a polymath Paul doesn't appear to be notable in any of the avenues he has pursued. Best, GPL93 (talk) 16:26, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.