Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drew Parker
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:12, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Drew Parker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This article is a project of one author, and I really don't see what's notable about the subject at this time Muboshgu (talk) 04:30, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:CRYSTAL. Niteshift36 (talk) 05:44, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 06:56, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 06:56, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete He's a college baseball player? Absolutely not they're only notable in extreme cases (see Stephen Strasburg).--Giants27 (t|c) 12:20, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - not notable per WP:ATHLETE. JohnCD (talk) 19:06, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Do Not Delete Notability is subjective and WP:ATHLETE is not a policy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stowesm (talk • contribs) 21:06, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:ATHLETE is Wikipedia's policy for determining notability, and according to it this individual is not notable. He may be notable to you (I assume you either are him, or know him?), so in that sense it is subjective. --Muboshgu (talk) 23:14, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Doesn't meet WP:ATHLETE, and although mentioned in several articles, doesn't qualify as "significant coverage" require by WP:GNG. BRMo (talk) 10:29, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.