Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drew Binsky

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗plicit 10:57, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Drew Binsky[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Travel Blogger not meeting WP:BIO. AntiVan (talk) 10:48, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Sources seem reliable, and plenty of them. Meets WP:BASIC. LizardJr8 (talk) 12:56, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. Plenty of sigcov. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 14:50, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Source added and there are plenty more out there, although the article already passed GNG/BASIC. Sam Sailor 15:07, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor 15:19, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor 15:19, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor 15:19, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: enough to pass notability. Kolma8 (talk) 22:32, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes GNG as good amount of reliable sources available. Although, more improvements can be done. JaredDaEconomist (talk) 05:07, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.