Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dreieck Oldenburg-West

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:16, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dreieck Oldenburg-West[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. One of a number of non-notable interchanges, which some feel are notable simply because they are named. No evidence of coming close to passing WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:43, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete—as written, this fails to meet WP:GNG. Imzadi 1979 → 17:43, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:38, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:38, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Unremarkable trumpet interchange. Dough4872 21:43, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: There is no consensus for the deletion of these German Autobahn interchanges articles as a block, and insufficient time allocated by the AfD process for editors to research their GNG individually. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kreuz Oranienburg and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kreuz Duisburg. Bahnfrend (talk) 08:47, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No evidence that the GNG is met by a WP:RUNOFTHEMILL interchange. Interchanges anywhere are not inherently notable. Named interchanges often are, but as all Autobahn interchanges are named there is no presumption of notability from that. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:10, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
delete No claim of notability and no reason to infer one. Interchanges are not inherently notable. Mangoe (talk) 03:42, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.