Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dreamseller

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:27, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dreamseller

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An autobiography from a marginally known figure. The only references to this article are from one of the author's appearance on his friend's cable radio show and the publisher's webpage. There have been no reviews or mentions of this in secondary publications in the two years the book has been out. No reviews from outlets that review books and no information of book sales. The article was given a PROD, but the tag was removed without changes/improvements. Therefore, the lack of any secondary sources makes it impossible to have an article about this book and the article should be deleted. EnterDamnMan79 (talk) 19:33, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - There is no indication that any of WP:NBOOK is satisified. In particular, I can find no reviews of this book, or any sort of critical commentary. [1] and [2] are mentions of the book as bing promoted by Brandon Novak. That falls well short of the sourcing that would be needed to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 17:07, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:16, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all above, Sadads (talk) 23:21, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This is a page of book, do not is from deletion « CA » ^Talk 15:56, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - AFD is not a vote. Could you please explain why you believe the article should be kept? -- Whpq (talk) 16:57, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - Correpted « CA » ^Talk 13:59, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    - What policy or guideline do you think applies, and which this article meets? -- Whpq (talk) 05:03, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, yummy spam, no reliable sources. --Nuujinn (talk) 16:35, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.