Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dream Machine (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, withdrawn. Geschichte (talk) 10:13, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dream Machine (film)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFO, WP:NFSOURCES and WP:SIGCOV; I found no RS reviews in a WP:BEFORE and no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. The Film Creator (talk) 14:59, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:24, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:56, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Poor Corey Haim ... the film was reviewed by the Ottawa Citizen, Toronto Star, Calgary Herald, Montreal Gazette, Edmonton Journal, and, in the States, Sun-Sentinel ... Canada loved the dude, apparently (separate reviews, found via ProQuest). Caro7200 (talk) 16:41, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above listed sources. DonaldD23 talk to me 17:19, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw per WP:NEXIST since there are reviews that exist. The Film Creator (talk) 13:54, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per lack of WP:BEFORE. I have replaced the IMDB refs with a book source and added a Variety review to the page. Cavarrone 09:41, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.