Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DreamRift

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) —Theo polisme 14:52, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DreamRift

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article's subject has a little notability but the article fails WP:GNG, WP:CORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. Article has insufficient sources. Mediran ^{talk to me!} 10:11, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The article is a very close paraphrase of the company's own website, maintaining all the POV content and doing little but changing "our" to "their". I've flagged an article on one of the company principals that also uses that page text for WP:COPYVIO deletion; that possibly also applies here? AllyD (talk) 11:09, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not sure if it's a copyright violation but it certainly does not appear to meet WP:GNG. The only sources I can find discuss Dreamrift's games rather than the company itself. §everal⇒|Times 18:11, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have found several sources that may help: Joystiq [1], GamerShell [2]. — ΛΧΣ21™ 20:46, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 06:40, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 06:40, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk). — Frankie (talk) 06:42, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Article has been rewritten & sourced since the AFD started. SNS (talk) 04:07, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.