Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drchopras

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per consensus and as an unsourced BLP. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:58, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Drchopras[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable doctor. This is a CV, not a biography. Also entirely unsourced BLP. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 04:45, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Google searches yielded no reliable sources which have Drachopras as explicit subject. Unsourced. Sp33dyphil ^{"Ad astra"} 05:30, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I couldn't confirm any of the information that would support notability of the subject. Limited support for WP:V and no support for WP:GNG makes this an easy delete. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 07:33, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:N.--Wahwahpedal (talk) 12:31, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete entirely non notable. Safiel (talk) 15:25, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Awards received do not infer notability as they are not major awards. Fails WP:GNG with no Google News search hits and I found no coverage in a Google News Archive search although the name seems somewhat common. A Google Scholar search produces several hits for what appears to be a different Chopra who mainly studies Carbon Nanotubes. OlYeller^Talktome 17:16, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
'Comment' I did some searches on the awards and found news reports of a few other people winning the Hahnemann award, but no coverage of this person. I found coverage of a dentist, a student, a scientist, and a banker with his name, but of course the article subject's a homeopathic doctor. I'm leaning strongly to delete but I'm waiting to hear back from the article creator, who I asked about further sources. (The only thing that makes me hesitate at all is that I don't know how good my access to Indian news sources is on the internet.) Cloveapple (talk) 18:05, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:37, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:37, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Nothing on Google and Yahoo that would be fit for a encyclopedia.SwisterTwister talk 05:10, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Unverifiable. Non-notable. Joe Chill (talk) 07:32, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.