Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Draper (producer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:50, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draper (producer)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Run-of-the-mill; no significant coverage; existing sources are unreliable and are mostly interviews and profiles. Jalen D. Folf (talk • contribs) 17:07, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:06, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:06, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 01:14, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator comment: I see the improvements to the article since this discussion opened, but no comments on this discussion. Remember that passing mentions of the music producer are not enough to satisfy WP:GNG; it has to be significant coverage specifically. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 18:45, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 08:31, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Most of the sources are insignificant on-line sites: interviews, press releases, self-downloads and the like. The only decent one is Billboard, but it's just routine promotional content rather than significant. Perhaps if there were a greater number of Billboard-type sources this run-of-the-mill type coverage could add up to something, but it doesn't clear the bar right now. ShelbyMarion (talk) 13:06, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.