Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragonology (book)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was already merged, redirected. Please note that AfD is not the place to list duplicate articles, they are merged by policy. Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 15:21, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dragonology (book)[edit]

There is already another article on the book this article is about, which is Dragonology: The Complete Book of Dragons. That article is also more comprehensive.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Energie (talk • contribs) .

Delete. Agreed. Kat, Queen of Typos 00:03, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge, splice and delete. There is quite a bit of material in the nominated article that is not reproduced in the far newer article and the page histories should be maintained. So I suggest a merge, splicing the histories,and then deleting. It doesn't really matter which direction, but if the splice should start with the older [nominated] article, then the better named, newer article can be deleted and this one moved to that name.--Fuhghettaboutit 07:53, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment.The nominated article doesn't even have the real author or publishing company. Just a comment.ЄИЄЯפЇЄ 18:50, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect merging any necessary content. Eluchil404 05:58, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect. I don't really see the "quite a bit of material", but if there is anything worth saving I guess moving it over to the other article. Merging of histories doesn't seem that important for a one-paragraph stub. Themindset 21:48, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. It's moot now. I went ahead an merged the material into Dragonology: The Complete Book of Dragons and performed a bit of a rewrite.--Fuhghettaboutit 23:36, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment recomend speedy redirect and close. AfD is not for Duplicate articles. Eluchil404 06:29, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.