Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragon Street Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎ Three weeks on, and this is al the discussion has produced. No one could call anything here a consensus. No prejudice if someone wants to run it back in a little while and see if a clearer consensus emerges. . Courcelles (talk) 13:45, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dragon Street Records[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is not eligible for PROD, so I have brought this to AFD. I found some online book sources in my search; sources that are not good enough to meet GNG. I think an AFD discussion could help to improve this before getting deleted. Thilsebatti (talk) 12:44, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and United States of America. Thilsebatti (talk) 12:44, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Texas. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:30, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If the nominator has book sources that could be brought to bear to save the article, then by all means we should add those. Please add those. Chubbles (talk) 02:54, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The book sources only mention about the subject. They are not good enough to meet GNG. Thilsebatti (talk) 04:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep I initially thought "keep" as the article claims the label started the career of the Dixie Chicks. But I can't verify that, and I think it's a false claim that should be removed. However, There is a full article about the label on the first page of Section 4 of the December 28, 1990 issue of the Fort Worth Star-Telegram. Also information from same newspaper February 2, 1990 page 16. Casual mention on July 20, 1990 page 12 from same newspaper. A bit more than a passing mention on June 29, 1990, page 10. Information about their re-release program on [1]. Although most of the mentions are photo credits, there is information about the label in the Handbook of Texas Music. Also information about the label [2]. I have not exhausted the Newspapes.com search or Google Books. But there is certainly enough here upon which to build an informational encyclopedia article. Although it fails Dixie Chicks, I can confirm several of the other bands, therefore the article is of interest to musicologists and music historians. The information can not be merged to any other article that I can think of, because too much information would be irrelevant to that topic. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 01:53, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That's sufficient for me; keep per 78.26. Chubbles (talk) 15:19, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 14:37, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:43, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.