Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragon Soop

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 06:05, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dragon Soop[edit]

Dragon Soop (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly does not meet WP:GNG. It is made my an un-notable brand, is only available in a small region and makes no claim as to why it is otherwise notable. Oddbodz - (Talk) (Contribs) 20:24, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:10, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:10, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:11, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - The article contain a list of references of which only one represents a reliable source in the form of a news story covering the potential abuse of the drink by students. I could find no more coverage. -- Whpq (talk) 17:37, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 00:30, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Appears to fail our general notability guidelines. Aside from the source Whpq found, I also found one where some guy stole some. Looks like it's getting some kids drunk, but, it's not ready for a Wikipedia article yet. Maybe someday. SarahStierch (talk) 02:27, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.