Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragon NaturallySpeaking
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Withdrawn by the nominator. NAC by—S Marshall Talk/Cont 09:56, 12 March 2010 (UTC) [reply]
- Dragon NaturallySpeaking (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Only a single source is independent of the subject, not satisfying WP:N. — Dædαlus Contribs 02:52, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - google searching for "Dragon NaturallySpeaking" brings up over 2 million results. Google News results bring up over 1400. The article needs sources, not deletion. The software is plenty notable. ~ Baron Von Yiffington . talk . contribs 02:56, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - current article not terrible and there are reliable sources out there to be found (examples: [1], [2], [3]). Loads more if you include Dragon Systems (examples: [4], [5], [6]). Guest9999 (talk) 02:59, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- To add to that note that the Business Week article states that "Hands down, Dragon NaturallySpeaking is the most popular speech-recognition program among the disabled" - strong indicator that plenty more sources are likely to exist. Guest9999 (talk) 03:01, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Withdrawn - Per the above.— Dædαlus Contribs 03:37, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.