Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drafting dog

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SNOW. Spinningspark settled the matter and Chiswick Chap has confirmed that the nomination is erroneous. (non-admin closure) Andrew D. (talk) 20:05, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Drafting dog[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I tried looking for sources but can't find any third party sources to support the article. Most of the information here is unreferenced. I checked the references and they only have a few lines describing drafting dog. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 16:20, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 16:20, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 16:20, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 16:21, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep. If you can't find third party sources for such a well known subject, you should go take lessons in how to use the internet. Books on the subject from just the first page of gbook results include;

and no, the last one is not a dating guide. SpinningSpark 18:35, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spinningspark, I searched Google and nothing came up. And the article is lacking sources --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 18:41, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - That's odd, I just pushed the 'Google' button at the head of this AfD section and got 8000 google hits, and there are plenty of books and other WP:RS among them. As for "the article is lacking sources", that has nothing at all to do with Notability, which depends on whether sources exist. They do. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:39, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Chiswick Chap, well I get hits to Pintrest and pics of the dogs --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 20:00, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.