Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Draft Biden

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Joe Biden. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 04:19, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft Biden

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Pretty clear case of failing WP:GNG. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:21, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:22, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:22, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Are you sure the organization is not notable? Searching "Draft Biden" yields 22,000+ results at Google and 140+ results at HighBeam Research. Also, if consensus determines a standalone article is not necessary, redirecting would be more appropriate than deleting because "Draft Biden" is a possible search term. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 21:24, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- There are some WP:GHITS, sure, but I don't think a Super PAC that Biden didn't seem to approve of has sustained notability. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:31, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - Whether or not Biden approved the PAC has nothing to do with notability. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 17:04, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Joe Biden as a possibly common and valid search term. However, it is not at all notable by itself. Bearian (talk) 16:28, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:33, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:19, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.