Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr Sayed Jumaa Salam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 01:51, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dr Sayed Jumaa Salam[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Self-published books and a self-run 'university'. No real notability claims here. Ironholds (talk) 02:57, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:04, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:04, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:04, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:04, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:04, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete individual has not acquired the attention of multiple independent reliable third-party sources. Article appears to be a vanity piece. KDS4444^Talk 16:11, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. GS and WorldCat seem to be unaware of him. Agricola44 (talk) 17:49, 3 March 2014 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. The article's vague claims of being a religious leader and educator fail verifiability unless reliable sources backing them up can be provided. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:43, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All I can find are videos of some of the subject's sermons and links to official websites or sites with direct ties. Perhaps a sincere and inspiring man, but the article doesn't seem to pass WP:GNG. MezzoMezzo (talk) 08:00, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.