Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr Pepper Snapple Bottling Group

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ~ Amory (utc) 21:26, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dr Pepper Snapple Bottling Group[edit]

Dr Pepper Snapple Bottling Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Uncited, unreferenced, no notability. Official site does not even match article title. Softlavender (talk) 06:51, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak delete - this does not have any citations, save for an external link which, as the nominator said, does not match the article's title. Vorbee (talk) 08:10, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and Merge any useful content to Keurig Dr Pepper which acquired Dr Pepper Snapple Group. At this point the article is out of date and the company was just a wholly owned subsidiary that probably isn’t notable on its own. TastyPoutine talk (if you dare) 12:14, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 00:04, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 22:42, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 22:43, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 22:44, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Once notable, always notable. We have lots of articles about defunct companies. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 22:45, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I have found several reliable sources about the company, so I am going to improve have improved, cited, corrected, and greatly expanded the article. I would withdraw this AfD nomination if I could, but there have already been some !votes other than keep. Softlavender (talk) 05:19, 21 July 2018 (UTC); edited 03:37, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Eastmain. I have fulfilled all "citation needed" tags and cleaned up the references to make the quality even better. AmericanAir88 (talk) 15:22, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Despite the switch of Nom to Keep, I feel sufficient disagreement remains to make further consideration necessary.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 20:58, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.