Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr Funfrock

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was ~~delete~~ Redirect to Little Big Adventure. BJ^Talk 23:46, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dr Funfrock[edit]

This character does not establish notability independent of the video game series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it doesn't need to exist. TTN (talk) 15:09, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. TTN (talk) 15:27, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Little Big Adventure, where all the pertinent information is. Spinouts happen because of WP:SIZE restrictions, which is obviously not the case here. Nifboy (talk) 16:48, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Little Big Adventure per above. See my rationale used on my last seven AfDs. MuZemike (talk) 18:15, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:GNG. ~ Ningauble (talk) 21:22, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable (not covered in-depth by multiple reliable sources) and redirect to LBA, nothing here but WP:NOT#PLOT baiting. Someone another 20:22, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to lack of sources, which makes it impossible to meet WP:GNG and WP:BURDEN at this time. But would support a redirect to Little Big Adventure as a compromise, if no sources can be found. Randomran (talk) 20:35, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.