Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. Usha Mukundan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —SpacemanSpiff 02:45, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Usha Mukundan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This biography does not meet notability criteria outlined at WP:BIO or WP:PROF. The only referenced claim to notability is a minor teaching award and the only other reference appears to be a biographical profile by a local publisher. Deli nk (talk) 17:44, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:18, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:18, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:18, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Notability has not been shown. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 22:17, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not pass WP:Prof or WP:GNG. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:52, 12 July 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPROF. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:05, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as still nothing at all actually convincing for even minimal notability. SwisterTwister talk 08:24, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable. Engleham (talk) 19:01, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The only thing that looks plausible for notability is the best teacher award, but it's a provincial-level rather than national-level award, and as near as I can tell this is the sort of award that maybe 100 people a year win, so not very selective. I don't think it's good enough, and other than that there's no evidence of passing WP:GNG nor WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:53, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.