Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. Twister
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Bobet 18:11, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Dr. Twister[edit]
Delete Fantastically written article, especially for ones first contribution to Wikipedia, but I'm not convinced that the subject is notable enough. Dave 16:47, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- However Lum the Mad is?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Zanderc (talk • contribs)
- Perfectly possible that I'm wrong, that's why I've brought this here. Dave 16:52, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I only posted this here because there was a broken link on the Lum the Mad page. User:ZanderC09:59, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- So from whence did you obtain the information that you put into the article? Uncle G 18:00, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- From whence? from 1st hand experience. User:ZanderC11:15, 12 September 2006 (PDT)
- Then please read our Wikipedia:No original research policy. Uncle G 18:35, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- From whence? from 1st hand experience. User:ZanderC11:15, 12 September 2006 (PDT)
- So from whence did you obtain the information that you put into the article? Uncle G 18:00, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I only posted this here because there was a broken link on the Lum the Mad page. User:ZanderC09:59, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Perfectly possible that I'm wrong, that's why I've brought this here. Dave 16:52, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete - full of uncited opinions, no reliable sources cited. It would have been a better idea to engage the author before bringing it here though. Yomanganitalk 17:07, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as original research unless rewritten to be verifiable from reliable sources, hopefully with evidence of meeting WP:WEB or some other topic-specific guideline. Sorry, Zander. I know this seems crazy from the just-arrived perspective, but these policies save us a lot of grief. Hang around AfD for a week and you'll begin to see the context. William Pietri 23:41, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.