Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. P. E. Abraham

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:08, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. P. E. Abraham[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG - vanity page with no reliable third party coverage. Cntras (talk) 06:15, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The following URL has the scanned newspaper copies that appeared in various publications. http://www.drabraham.in/category/news/ Will this be enough ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anandkanatt (talk • contribs) 12:02, 28 January 2011 (UTC) — Anandkanatt (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 00:04, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:07, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:08, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Spam. Promotional and full of hype; unsupported by Reliable Source references. Unfortunately I can't read any of the scanned newspapers provided by Anandkanatt (which are located on Dr. Abraham's web page; I don't know if that is considered independent), so I can't tell if they qualify as Reliable Source coverage, but I couldn't find any coverage in the usual places. In any case, even if everything in the article is true, it doesn't add up to notability in my opinion. --MelanieN (talk) 04:07, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:23, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete All the hallmarks of a quack, though of course I'm not saying he is a quack. "Has healed 150,000 patients" -- what a crock. Z-E-R-O in RS. EEng (talk) 13:16, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as advertising. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:17, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 20:17, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as vanity article. LibStar (talk) 06:51, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.