Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. Amit Abraham
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WP:SNOW MBisanz talk 01:19, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Dr. Amit Abraham (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Subject of article does not appear to meet the minimum inclusion criteria as spelled out in Wikipedia:Notability or Wikipedia:Notability (people) or Wikipedia:Notability (academics). Article has no independent references; indeed it has no references at all at the time of this writing. Jayron32.talk.contribs 05:01, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Vanity piece, WP:AUTOBIO, should go unless someone comes along and rewrites it as a third-party piece with WP:reliable sources. —Largo Plazo (talk) 05:39, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Salih (talk) 08:08, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment He seems to have written books as seen here and here and here. I, however, cant be sure if it is the same Amit Abraham. --Like I Care 12:45, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I added the books and the one article I could find . On their basis, i do not consider this makes for notability under WP:PROF, not even remotely. WP PROF in terms of research is judged by international standards. I found 2 articles listing him among the unsuccessful candidates for an administrative position. I do not think this satisfies WP:BIO. DGG (talk) 14:26, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as an autobiography. Alexius08 (talk) 14:35, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:02, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not notable. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 11:10, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak conditional keep if explained/cited what Recipient of the U.P. Shikshak Saman for the year 2006 awarded by Bright Organization For Youth is. Also the facts.
--Athos, Porthos, and Aramis (talk) 11:41, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. As noted by DGG, passes neither WP:PROF nor WP:BIO.--Eric Yurken (talk) 16:58, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:PROF and WP:AUTHOR. Abecedare (talk) 00:27, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails various criteria. Vanity page. Yintaɳ 10:12, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: The creator of the article has been using at least two accounts, Dr.Amit Abraham (talk · contribs) and Dr. Amit Abraham (talk · contribs). — Athaenara ✉ 11:17, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- ...and has been extensively spamming his books - four articles deleted G11 so far. JohnCD (talk) 11:41, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Salih (talk) 15:35, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non notable. Its amazing how many Ph.D. programmees consider themselves eminent enough to deserve a Wikipedia entry just becasuse they have done some "resarch" as a part of the Ph.D programme. --Deepak D'Souza 11:47, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Here's some LoL factor: His book has received only one rating[1] , 5 out of 5 from himself--Deepak D'Souza 11:54, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I've heard of self-promotion, but rating your own books.... [stunned silence] Yintaɳ 16:21, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.