Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Douglas Wojtowicz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Mack Bolan. Davewild (talk) 08:45, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Douglas Wojtowicz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not sure if being a part of the team (ghostwriting team?) behind a couple of characters is sufficient for independent notability. Ricky81682 (talk) 09:05, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:16, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:16, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:37, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Re-direct to Don Pendleton This author writes under the name of Don Pendleton, not Douglas Wojtowicz, and his books are covered on that page. LaMona (talk) 22:28, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Re-direct to Mack Bolan OMG this is confusing! OK, Don Pendleton died in 1975. His books, however, continue to be written by other authors (listed at Mack_Bolan -- about a hundred of them!). No reviews of any of these at Booklist, although one other book gets praised for not being as bad as a Mack Bolan book. None of this fellow's books are reviewed at Kirkus reviews which review just about everything. No mention of him beyond social media, that I can find. He also has written some short stories that are in collections, mainly SciFi. LaMona (talk) 00:22, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 12:46, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Esquivalience t 13:19, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience t 13:19, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.